2006 (3) TMI 426

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... mar, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Sekhon, Member (T)]. Heard both sides. This application is filed in an appeal against order in Appeal No. SVS/66/NGP/1/2005, dated 24-2-2005 by the said orders. Revenue had demanded duty of Rs. 43,41,250/- under Section 11A(1) and penalty of Rs. 37,11,894/- under Section 11AC and Rs. 6,29,356/- under Rule 25 of the Central Excise (2) Rules .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... td., 2002 (140) E.L.T. 84 (Tribunal) = 2002 (48) R.L.T. 12 (CEGAT-Delhi) LMS Foundry Pvt. Ltd., 2001 (132) E.L.T. 709 (Tri.-Delhi) and when read along with CBEC Circular No. 509/5/2000/CX, dated 18-1-2000 herein it is clarified that SSI benefit cannot be denied when inputs are supplied with the brand names and the fact that the department was informed by a letter dated 5-7-2000 about application .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X