2006 (3) TMI 530

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... i, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J) (Oral].- In Final Order No. 556 557/01 [2001 (132) E.L.T. 453 (T)]passed by this Bench in Appeal Nos. C/736 737/96, the original authority was directed to re-adjudicate the case before it, after hearing the party, within a period of five months from the date of receipt of the order. Unfortunately, this direction was not h .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eping over the case, unmindful (if not regardless) of the specific direction issued by this Bench. This appears to be a fit case for reference to the Hon ble High Court for initiating action against the officer concerned for contempt of the Tribunal. We, however, refrain from doing so in this case, having regard to the fact that the Hon ble High Court, which had occasion to notice the conduct of t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X