2005 (11) TMI 395

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... [Order]. The issue involved in both the stay petitions is regarding the amount of duty demanded and confirmed against the appellants in respect of the goods cleared by them to West Bengal Handloom Powerloom Development Corporation Ltd. 2. Ld. Advocate, Shri S.N. Sinha Mahapatra, submits that the appellants are eligible for the benefit of Notification No. 5/98, dated 2-6-98. More specifi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Kumar on the other hand submits that the appellant s production of the Certificate from the West Bengal State Government Handloom and Powerloom Development Corporation Ltd. is subsequent to the clearance of the goods and hence they are not eligible for the benefit of the Notification No. 5/98 and they should be directed to pre-deposit the entire amount of penalty in this case. 4. Considered the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... unt of duty in this case. In view of the above, I direct the appellants to deposit an amount of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand only) within a period of eight weeks from today and report compliance of the same on 10th January, 2006 to the Commissioner (Appeals) of Central Excise, Kolkata IV. On such deposit being made and proof of the same being produced before the Commissioner (Appeals), th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X