2005 (6) TMI 509

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... [Order per : K.C. Mamgain, Member (T)]. Under this application, the applicant is seeking restoration of his appeal which was dismissed under Final Order No. A/20/2003-NB(S) dated 7-1-2003. 2. Shri A.P. Mathur, learned Advocate pleaded that the appeal was rejected for non-compliance of the provisions of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The appellant could not deposit the amount of Rs .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... has not taken proper step for complying with the provisions of the law for pre-depositing the amount fixed by the Tribunal, in time. Therefore, there is no ground for restoring the appeal. 4. We have considered the submissions made by both sides. We find that the applicant was directed to pre-deposit only a small sum of Rs. 10,000/- on or before 28-10-02 although penalty of Rs. 1,00,000/- was im .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X