2006 (9) TMI 435

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pondent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. This appeal filed by Department is against Order-in-Appeal No. 5/99 (M-II) (D), dated 12-3-1999 of the Commissioner (Appeals) classifying Pressure Pan without Lid, of steel, under Heading 73.23 and Pressure Pan without Lid, of Aluminium, under S.H. 7615.10, as kitchen articles and accordingly granting exemption from payment of duty under No .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he above orders, followed by the lower appellate authority in the impugned order, was appealed against by the Department. In the case of Commissioner v. Bigen Industries Limited [2006 (197) E.L.T. 305 (S.C.)] cited by ld. Counsel, the Hon ble Supreme Court held that, where an earlier decision of the Tribunal between the same parties on the same facts had attained finality for want of challenge by .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... No. 5/99 ibid. 3. Ld. SDR has relied on the decision of this Bench in Commissioner v. Kali Steel Engineering Industries Pvt. Ltd. - 2005 (187) E.L.T. 431 (Tri-Chennai) = (2005-TIOL-821-CESTAT-MAD), wherein Pressure Pan with Lid and Pressure Pan without Lid were classified under Tariff Headings different from the one s under which the subject goods have been classified in the impugned order a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X