TMI Blog2007 (1) TMI 346X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r the Appellant. Shri V. Seshagiri Rao, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. - One of the applications filed by the appellants is for condonation of delay of 200 days involved in the filing of their appeal and the other is for waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery in respect of the amount of service tax demanded by the lower authorities. 2. The impugned Ord ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d by him. He had also lost all his business on account of cancellation of IATA recognition. The affidavit further says that the deponent started recovering from depression only just before the filing of the appeal. Ld. Counsel reiterates these averments of the Managing Director of the company and prays for condonation of the delay of the appeal. Ld. SDR opposes this prayer by submitting that the r ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ny must manage the affairs of the company including filing of appeals with the Tribunal. As rightly pointed out by ld. SDR, the delay of 200 days has not been satisfactorily explained by the appellants. In the result, the application gets dismissed and consequentially the appeal also gets dismissed along with the stay application.
(Order dictated and pronounced in open Court) X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|