2006 (9) TMI 457

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... h sides. This is an Application for restoration of appeal. Earlier also an application was filed for restoration of the appeal and the same was dismissed for non-prosecution on 18-4-2006, by observing that none appeared for the appellants on that date and also on two earlier occasions. Learned Counsel for the appellants submits that due to closure of the appellants Unit, there was a communication .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Fabrics Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India; (b) 2004 (175) E.L.T. - 559 (Tri. - Bang.) in the case of Remington Rand (I) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore; (c) 2006 (196) E.L.T. - 89 (Tri. - Del.) in the case of R.B. Jodhamal Industries v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Jammu. 2. I am convinced about the fact that due to sufficient cause, the appellants were prevented from .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X