TMI Blog2007 (5) TMI 469X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. - The appellant has filed this application for recall of Final Order No. 2239-2245/2005 dated 27-12-2005 [2006 (200) E.L.T. 593 (Tribunal)]. The Final Order No. 2243/2005 pertains to the appellant in respect of the appeal No. C/13/2005. The other appellants were represented by Shri B.V. Kumar and Shri Lakshminarayan, Advocates. Howe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Counsel submits that several legal plea has not been answered in terms of the Final Order pertaining to this appellant. 4. On a careful consideration of the matter, we find that the appellant was not represented. Although the points raised by the appellant has been dealt with while passing the order, the learned Counsel submits that several legal plea has not been answered in terms of the Final ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|