2007 (6) TMI 371

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... i Anil Kumar, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J) (Oral)]. The misc. application has been filed under Section 41 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules seeking refund of Rs. 6,000/- paid in terms of the Defect Memo issued by the Registry for additional court fee in view of single appeal filed against two Orders-in-Original. 2. It is the submission of the learned Counsel .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e case of Ekantika Copiers (P) Ltd. v. CCE - 1991 (56) E.L.T. 350 would apply. This Larger Bench comprises of 5 Members who have taken a view that the number of appeals will be based on the number of adjudicating orders. There are two Orders in adjudication in this case and the appellants are required to file two appeals. There is no mistake in the Defect Memo seeking for additional court fee. The .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X