2007 (6) TMI 405

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e Respondent. [Order]. These are applications filed by the appellants for condonation of the delay of their appeals, which are against Orders-in-Appeal Nos. 113-114/2004 dated 15-10-2004 passed by Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Trichy. The impugned orders were received by the appellants on 20-10-2004 and the appeals were filed on 4-12-2006 with a delay of 25 months and 14 days .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... needed reconsideration and accordingly referred the case to a Larger Bench. Later on, in the case reported as Vikram Cement v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore [2006 (194) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.)], a Larger Bench of the Hon ble Supreme Court overruled J.K. Udaipur Udyog (supra) and inputs used at off-factory mines were held to be eligible for Modvat/Cenvat credit for the cement manufacturer. The ap .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X