2002 (1) TMI 1262

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Balasundaram, Member (J)]. We waive the deposit of duty of Rs. 5,85,694/- confirmed as differential duty against the importers herein on the ground that they had not satisfied the conditions laid down under Notification 224/92 regarding evidence of consumption of imported goods in the manner laid down in the notification and proceed to take up the appeal itself for hearing, with the consent .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ner who passed the present adjudication order confirmed the duty demand after hearing the importers on the ground that there was no proof of consumption of imported goods in the manner prescribed in the notification. His order was upheld by the lower appellate authority. Hence, the appeal before the Tribunal. 3. On hearing both sides we note that in December, 1996 itself the importer had submitt .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... re heard by the Dy. Commissioner who passed the present adjudication order they submitted a letter on 4th July, 2000 along with a letter regarding details of the account maintained by them. However, in spite of all this material on record both the authorities below have chosen to close their eyes to the documentary evidence submitted by the appellant and have turned a Nelson s eye to the entire ma .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X