9911796707
TMI Blog2008 (1) TMI 666X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... led by M/s. Glaxo SmithKline Consumer Healthcare Ltd. (GSCHL) for waiver of pre-deposit of a demand of Rs. 7,85,293/- and Rs. One lakh penalty imposed on the assessee. After hearing both the parties on the stay application the appeal is taken up for disposal. 2. GSCHL receives Horlicks in bulk from its associate concern in Rajmundhry and pack them in bottles of various capacities. For this purpo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... authorities held that the materials that went into the making of the export goods were not eligible for CENVAT credit as the assessee had not utilized them in the manufacture of final product as stipulated in sub-rule (h) of Rule 2 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 (CVR). Treating the credit as irregularly availed, the impugned demand was made and upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals). 3. The ld. Con ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y be set aside. 4. Ld. SDR submits that the process of manufacture undertaken by the appellants to produce the export goods was not advanced as a ground before the lower authorities to justify their entitlement to credit. He submits that as the process involved is not on record the matter may be remanded for a fresh decision. 5. I have carefully considered the case records and submissions made ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... facture . From the above Chapter Note it is obvious that the export goods were manufactured by the appellants and cleared under cover of letter of undertaking in terms of Rule 19 of CER. As the export goods had been manufactured by the appellants, they were eligible for CENVAT credit of duty paid on inputs. In view of this legal position the impugned order does not appear sustainable. However, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
