9911796707
TMI Blog2008 (2) TMI 695X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t. [Order]. Being aggrieved with the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), vide which he has accepted the assessee s contention as regards payment of interest on the amount of pre-deposit, within a period of 3 months from the date of the order of the Tribunal, Revenue has filed the present appeal. I have heard Dr. M.K. Rajak, learned SDR appearing for the Revenue. The respondent ha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... evant date and inasmuch as the refund was given by cheque on 6-12-05, i.e. within a period of 3 months from the date of the receipt of the order, no interest liability would accrue on the Revenue. 3. I find various decisions of the Hon ble Supreme Court as also of the Tribunal, as regards payment of interest refers to a period of 3 months from the date of the order. Even the Board s circular iss ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... by the Department, in which case, they would not be aware of passing of such order, resulting in refund of pre-deposit. As such, it would be reasonable to hold the date of receipt of the order as the relevant date for the purpose of refund of pre-deposit granted. It may be mentioned here that if an assessee bring it to the notice of the Revenue about the passing of the order then that date should ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
