9911796707
TMI Blog2008 (3) TMI 525X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or the Appellant. Shri P.M. Govande, Jt. CDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : M.V. Ravindran, Member (J)]. This stay application is directed against Order-in-Original No. 64/2007-08, dated 26-2-2008. 2. Heard both sides and perused the records. Learned Senior Counsel submits that the entire order of the adjudicating authority seems to proceed on a different fact than the allegatio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... evocation of licence. 3. Learned Jt. CDR reiterates the finding of the adjudicating authority and states that the main importer having moved the Settlement Commission the fact remains that there was any misdeclaration. 4. On perusal of the order, we find that the adjudicating authority has exercised the powers conferred under Rule 21 CHALR to prohibit the applicant/ appellant. We find that not ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed Commissioner in prohibiting the current applicant from conducting business in the Mumbai Commissionerate requires to be stayed immediately. Accordingly, we stay the operation of the impugned order till the disposal of the appeal. 5. As the issue involved in this case being the day to day business of the CHA and his staff, we direct the registry to list the appeal on 23-4-2008. Order by Dasti. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
