9911796707
TMI Blog2008 (7) TMI 693X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hence set aside - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. - C/793/2005 - C/331/2008(PB) - Dated:- 9-7-2008 - S/Shri S.S. Kang, Rakesh Kumar, JJ. REPRESENTED BY : Shri Rajesh Rawal, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri Amit Jain, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Kang, Vice-President]. The appellant filed this appeal against the impugned order whereby bars viz. pe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... P stickers fixed were released and the packages not having MRP stickers were confiscated on the ground that the as per Foreign Trade, (Development and Regulation) Act, the Director General of Foreign Trade vide Notification dated 24-11-2000 regulated the import of commodities. As per the notification all packaged products, are subject to compliance of Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... bject goods have been unlawfully imported into India, therefore, the confiscation of the goods, in question, is not sustainable 4. The contention of the Revenue is that at the time of import it is mandatory that all the package commodities imported into India are required to carry name and address of importer, net quantity of goods, manufacture and year of packing and maximum retail price, as th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ds in question were imported the same were taken into consideration by the adjudicating authority. The goods were held to be liable for confiscation on the ground that the seized goods were not the same which were imported under the Bills of Entry produced by the appellant. The only ground to arrive at such conclusion was that MRP stickers were not on the packages. Merely absence of MRP stickers o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
