2008 (9) TMI 656

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... excess of 5% allowed - appeal disposed off. - C/372/2008 - 1112/2008 - Dated:- 1-9-2008 - Dr. S.L. Peeran, Shri T.K. Jayaraman, JJ. REPRESENTED BY : Shri D.V. Anjaneyulu, Chartered Accountant, for the Appellant. Ms. Sudha Koka, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : T.K. Jayaraman, Member (T)]. This appeal has been filed against the Order-in-Appeal No. 10/2008 (H-II) Cus. date .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... is mentioned. Since nothing is mentioned against the column No. 5 except the above mark. The appellant claimed that no additional duty is payable and therefore he claimed the refund. But the lower authority stated that the fact that such a remark is there does not mean no additional customs duty is payable. As there is no exemption from additional duty, he rejected the refund claim. The appellant .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X