2008 (11) TMI 457

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... called, it was noticed that the appeal earlier dismissed for no COD clearance was restored by the bench by order dated 5-8-08. But the order to such effect despatched by the registry does not clearly shows the number of the order and date of despatch of order for its identification. It also reveals that no notice was issued to the litigant for hearing today i.e. on 11-11-08. 2. In view of above .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... (ii) Why number and date of order is not clearly visible and that confuses as to identification of the order. (iii) What is the practice for issue of notice followed when a matter is adjourned and parties had not taken notice in the course of hearing in the open court. Registry is required to explain on the above on 14-11-08 for appropriate orders. The explanation filed by Assistant Regi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X