9911796707
TMI Blog2008 (5) TMI 583X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lant. Shri K.J. Sanchis, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : B.S.V. Murthy, Member (T)]. - The appellants have filed this modification application for modification of the order Nos. M/160-162/WZB/Ahd/2008, dt. 18-2-2008, which itself was an order rejecting the modification amplication filed for modifying the order Nos. S/1386-1391/WZB/ Ahd/2007, dt. 17-12-2007. 2. The order dt. 17 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s suspended since 2-8-2004. 3. In the 18-2-2008 order, ld. Advocate for the appellants pointed out that the appellants' property at Ankleshwar has been taken over by IFCI Ltd. and a notice for auction has already been Issued. However, it was observed that there has been no change in circumstances and therefore the modification application was rejected. 4. In this modification applicati ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n recover by disposal of the properties attached. 5. We find that this is a very peculiar situation. The appellant is a limited company and therefore liability of the Directors and the shareholders is limited to their shareholding and as rightly pointed out by the ld. Advocate, other than properties in the name of the company, it would not be possible for any one to recover additional dues s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
