9911796707
TMI Blog2008 (8) TMI 710X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... .G. Chacko, Member (J)]. This appeal of the Revenue is against an order of the Commissioner (Appeals) setting aside a demand of duty on the respondents by granting them SSI benefit under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. There is no representation for the respondents today. The notice of hearing issued to them has returned with the postman s remark left . No change of address has been intimated by ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 95. The buyer-company did not apply for registration of the brandname in their favour, either. In the circumstances, the finding of the lower appellate authority has only to be sustained. Accordingly, it is held that the goods in question were cleared by the respondents under their own brandname and they were eligible for SSI benefit. In relation to the other brandname, it was found by the lower a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ame South Safe . Now that it has been held that the brandname South Safe belonged to the respondents, the decision of the original authority for levy of duty on the goods, whether cleared under the brandname crystal or cleared under the brandname South Safe , cannot be restored. On the other hand, the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) on the point has to be sustained. 3. In the result ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
