TMI Blog2008 (11) TMI 508X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ant. Shri S.R. Prasad, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. After hearing both the sides. We dispense with the condition of pre-deposit and proceed to decide the appeal itself. We find that earlier also the appeals were dismissed by Commissioner (Appeals), for non-compliance with the stay order passed by him. Matter came up before the Tribunal and vide o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tel deposited the amount on 26-2-2007 i.e. after a delay of around one month. By considering the said delay as a short delay, we condone the same and consider the deposit as have been made in compliance with the Tribunal s order. However, as regards deposits made by second appellant, Shri Viraj P. Shah, we find that though the major part of deposit of Rs. 40,000/- was made on 3-4-2007, the balance ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|