2008 (8) TMI 748

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Kang, Vice-President]. Heard both sides. 2. The applicant filed this application for condoning the delay of 286 days in filing the appeal. The contention of the applicant is that the concerned person did not follow the matter for filing the appeal and he resigned on 30-5-2007, therefore, the appeal could not be filed within the normal period of limitatio .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... mentioned that the concerned person Shri Shrikant Bhoot, the concerned official resigned on 30-5-07, whereas the present impugned order is passed on 31-5-07. In view of the fact that the impugned order is passed after the resignation of the concerned persons, therefore, we find that the applicant failed to show the sufficient cause for not filing the appeal within the period of limitation. The CO .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X