9911796707
TMI Blog2009 (4) TMI 602X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rova, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. Both the restoration applications are being disposed off by a common order as they are from the same applicant and are more or less on the same facts. 2. Dealing with the first application, ld. Advocate Shri Arun Mehta submits that the stay order was passed in 1983 directing the applicant to give bank guarantee fo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... h was also rejected vide order dated 17-9-1992. Similar are the circumstances in respect of the second ROA with a little change in the dates. 3. The present ROA now stand filed by the applicant on or around Nov., 2008 requesting for restoration of the appeals dismissed earlier on the ground of non compliance, on the ground that the applicant is now ready to deposit the directed amounts. Ld. JD ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pellant s prayer at this point to restore the already dead appeals cannot be entertained. It is also seen that the appellant has not deposited the directed amount till date and has moved the restoration application without first depositing the confirmed dues. As such, the reasons for rejection of earlier restoration application as upheld by High Court and Supreme Court continue to exist justifying ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
