2009 (4) TMI 613

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... partment against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) dated 27-4-2007 by which, the order of the original authority demanding duty of Rs. 4,09,788/- and imposing penalty of equal amount was set aside. 2. Heard the learned DR. None appears for the respondent. 3.1 The facts of the case are that the respondent has done job work for M/s. Goldwin Technologies (P) Ltd. The original authority hel .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . 5. Show cause notice has been issued based on audit objection. It is not disputed that the respondent was doing job work for M/s. Goldwin Technologies (P) Ltd. They have claimed that there were some short-supply as per earlier challans in returning processed goods which were made good. The order in original confirming demand of duty has been passed stating that It was inferred that party clea .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X