TMI Blog2009 (4) TMI 743X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n-Appeals No. 153/2008 dated 15-12-2008 passed by the Commissioner of Customs .(Appeals) Bangalore. 2. I heard both sides. 3. The issue is very simple. The appellant imported certain cosmetics through Bangalore in terms of Notification No. 92/2004 dated 10-09-2004. Bangalore was not one of the designated ports for import of the said consignment. In view of this, appellants requested for trans- ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... have given a finding that there is no violation. The Commissioner ought not to have imposed penalty under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962. 5. On a careful consideration of the issue, I find that in the facts and circumstances of the case, the penalty imposed is not justified. When there is a clear finding that there is no violation, penalty can not be imposed. Hence, I set aside the impugne ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|