Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2009 (6) TMI 838

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e assessment. Despite several reminders issued between 1995 and 2001 the appellants did not appear before the authorities with necessary documents to finalize the assessment of import under Project Import Regulations. Under a communication dated 11-6-2002 the Deputy Commissioner of Customs, Chennai proposed to demand an amount of Rs. 1,65,208/- being the benefit availed by the importer under Project Import Regulations 1986 for their failure to satisfy their eligibility to the concessional rate by producing the required documents before the proper officer of Customs. The original authority passed an order confirming the demand of differential duty as proposed in the Show Cause Notice. As per this order the appellants had received communicati .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the order of the original authority. He went on to direct the original authority that the matter could be examined on its merits at the time of finalization of project after giving the appellants due opportunity to respond to this query. 2. The impugned order is challenged in the appeal filed before the Tribunal on various grounds. The main grounds raised are that the notice basic to the proceedings having invoked Section 28 of the Customs Act, which was found to be not appropriate in the impugned order, the entire proceedings were vitiated as found by the Commissioner (Appeals). The other important ground taken is that after the proper officer having satisfied that the application of the importer of the impugned goods under the Project I .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he original authority in terms of Regulation 7 is appropriate and is upheld. In the circumstances whether the Commissioner (Appeals) should have admitted the installation certificate produced by the appellants as evidence and decided the matter considering the same is not material. Regulation 7 reads as follows:- Finalisation of contract - The importer shall within three months from the date of clearance for home consumption of the last consignment of the goods or within such extended period as the proper officer may allow, submit a statement indicating the details of the goods imported together with necessary documents as proof regarding the value and quantity of the goods so imported in terms of this Regulation and any other document t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates