TMI Blog2010 (7) TMI 823X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Nos. 2 to 6 to disburse the salary said to have not been paid to the petitioner since August 2008, the direction to respondents Nos. 2 to 6 to intimate the petitioner about holding the annual general meeting of the company and also intimation about the board resolutions to be adopted or any meeting to be held in respect of any administrative decision; for appointment of a committee of management by superseding the board of the company; for enquiry into the accounts of the first respondent-company; and for injunction restraining respondent Nos. 2 to 6 from controlling the management of the company and also with costs. The petition averments in brief 2. The petitioner herein is a shareholder and director of the first respondent-company w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... verments of the petitioner, this Bench passed an order on 30-6-2010 and thereafter on 13-7-2010, directing the respondents to give inspection to the petitioner to the documents covered under section 163 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, the petitioner with two representatives (one accountant and one advocate) visited the office of the company on 19-7-2010, by giving a requisition to give inspection to the following documents : (1)balance-sheet and profit and loss account along with all schedules. (2)cash flow statement, if any. (3)auditor's report. (4)books of account General Ledger, Journal, Cash/Bank Book, Vouchers, Sales/Purchase Register, Stock Register. (5)minutes of meetings and resolution. (6)memorandum and audits ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s Act. Since the relief for remuneration to the petitioner not being under the scope of section 163 of the Act, he prayed that the above reliefs should be rejected. 6. On hearing either side, this Bench has decided this case as follows : It is evident that this petition has been filed under section 163 of the Act; thereby the scope of the reliefs sought by the petitioner must be within the scope of that section only. The reliefs sought by the petitioner seeking directions for monthly remuneration, not being within the scope of section 163 of the Act, the petitioner is not entitled to seek that relief, hence the same is rejected. Likewise the other reliefs sought by the petitioner, except the inspection of documents covered under section ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|