9911796707
TMI Blog1954 (1) TMI 15X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f the assessment order on the assessee. The assessee, however, filed the appeal on 12th August, 1949. There was no power then to condone any delay. The Commercial Tax Officer rejected the appeal as barred by time, and that order was dated 19th August, 1949. Thereupon the assessee preferred a revision petition to the Board of Revenue, because before the amendment of the Act in 1951, there was no right of appeal against the order of the Commercial Tax Officer. It was the amending Act of 1951 that enacted the present Section 12A, constituting the Appellate Tribunal with powers of entertaining appeals. The Board did not pass any orders on the petition filed by the assessee, but after the amending Act of 1951 had been passed under Section 19 o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ssee." It is against this order that the Government have preferred this revision petition. The learned Government Pleader contended that the Appellate Tribunal had no jurisdiction at all to direct the Commercial Tax Officer to take up in revision suo motu any order passed by a subordinate of his. It is not really necessary to decide this question in these proceed- ings. Though the Appellate Tribunal used the word "direct" in asking the Commercial Tax Officer to take up the matter suo motu it is fairly obvious reading the order of the Appellate Tribunal as a whole, that it was only advisory. The order appealed against, i.e., the order on appeal of the Commercial Tax Officer, was not set aside, and it should be remem- bered that the Commerc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ht there is nothing to which objection can be taken. Certainly there is no error of law which this Court is called upon to correct at this stage. It is represented to us that, despite the order of the Appellate Tribunal which was on 31st March, 1952, nothing was done by the department. Possibly they thought filing this petition to revise that order absolved them of the duty to investigate further on the lines indicated by the Appellate Tribunal. Instructions of this kind issued either by the Appellate Tribunal or by this Court, when anything needing correction comes to its notice should be respected by the departmental authorities and we trust that it is in that light the whole problem will be viewed by the departmental authorities. The pet ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
