2009 (7) TMI 1026

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s for restoration of the Appeals. The Appeals were dismissed for non-prosecution. The contention is that the Applicants had not received the notice of hearing. Therefore the final Order dismissing the Appeals is recalled and Appeals are restored to their original numbers. 3. The Appellants filed these Appeals against the impugned order whereby 474 pieces of Sarees of different varieties and 35 ( .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... efore the goods were rightly confiscated. 6. In this case the goods i.e. Sarees and sugar were confiscated only on the ground that in the border area unauthorized exportation of the sugar and Sarees is common. 7. I find there is no evidence on record to show that the goods in question are for unauthorized exportation to Bangladesh. In these circumstances the impugned order confiscating the goo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X