2009 (2) TMI 711

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... led for rectifications of certain typographical mistakes arising out of the Final Order No. 1108/2008 dated 25-8-2008 [2009 (13) S.T.R. 655 (Tri.-Bang.)] passed by this Bench. The following typographical errors have been pointed out. (i) Under Appearance, Mr. MSV Prasad has been typed which should have been Mr. MVS Prasad. (ii) 1st Para 1st line :- This appeal ahs should have been This .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ara 8: on account of reimbursable account should have been from the lump sum amount charged . (xi) 11th line in para 8 on page 7: CHA apart for should have been CHA apart from . 2. Heard both sides. 3. Perused the records. On verification, we find that these are only typographical errors and can be corrected. Thus the ROM is allowed by correcting the mistakes as follows :- (i) Under .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... be replaced with provider ... . (ix) 5th line in para 6 on page 6: the word interpret be replaced with interpreted . (x) 10th line in para 8: on account of reimbursable account be replaced with from the lump sum amount charged . (xi) 11th line in para 8 on page 7: CHA apart for be read as CHA apart from . (Operative portion of the order pronounced in open court on conclusion of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X