TMI Blog2009 (10) TMI 669X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ndent. ORDER Heard both sides. Shri S.S. Gupta, learned Chartered Accountant appearing for the appellants states that the appellants are only contesting the demand of Rs. 93,21,222/- as they have no grievance against the balance amount of Rs. 1,09,766/- with regard to renting of immovable property. He further states that, of the contested amount, Rs. 14,14,950/- is in relation to sale of space a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... up in the boxes and stands merely to identify the sponsors and no tax can be levied on the charges received, under the category of sale of space and time for advertisement. He argues that the appropriate service involved is 'sponsorship service' for which the demands should have been made from the sponsors instead of demanding the amounts from the appellants. He does not plead any financial hards ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... view that the case of the appellants is an arguable one as they have not made out a case for complete waiver of the pre-deposit. They have also not pleaded any financial hardship. As such taking into consideration the amount of Rs. 27,70,469/- already paid by the appellants, we direct them to predeposit a further amount of Rs. 20,00,000/- (Rupees twenty lakhs only) within eight weeks from today a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|