9911796707
TMI Blog2009 (8) TMI 987X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ion is filed by the applicant for implementation of our Final Order No. 296 297/2003 dated 28-2-2003, vide which we had allowed the appeal filed by the applicant/appellant with consequential relief/relies of the goods which were seized and lying with the Departmental authorities. 2. When the matter was listed on 13-8-2009 for ascertaining compliance ld. JDR required some time to assess the pos ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ted the goods on 2-4-09. The department had preferred an appeal against the Final Order No. 296 and 297/2003 dated 28-2-03. Which was dismissed for non-prosecution vide C.P No. 1478 of 2003 dated 22-10-07. Subsequently, the department vide restoration application No. IA No. 2/2008 dated 23-6-08 requested the Hon ble High Court of Karnatka to recall the order dated 22-10-07. Yours faithfully ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e that needs to be adhered to. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the lower authorities are directed to release the goods within a period of two weeks from today and file compliance report to the Tribunal on 10-9-2009 without fail. A copy of this order may be given to the ld. Counsel by dasti to give it to the lower authorities. (Pronounced and dictated in open Court) - - TaxTMI - T ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
