2009 (9) TMI 795

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... bit in RG-23C Part II, while the said amount was paid by debit in RG-23A Part II on 29-1-1999 under protest has been rejected by the authorities below on the ground that the claim is hit by limitation. 2. I have heard both sides on the appeal against such rejection. Once payment was made in 1999 by debit in RG-23A Part II, the assessees should have sought refund of the amount paid earlier in 199 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X