1980 (3) TMI 236

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s been referred to this Court by the Board of Revenue at the instance of the Commissioner: "Whether, under the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in holding that under rule 5 of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules, only the Sales Tax Officer is competent to assess a dealer when licence granted under section 13 of the Act is cancelled by him for failure to comply .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... upheld by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the appeal was dismissed. Thereupon the assessee preferred a second appeal before the Board of Revenue. The Board held that, in view of the provisions of rule 5 of the Rules, the Assistant Sales Tax Officer was not competent to assess the assessee. In this view of the matter, the Board allowed the appeal and remanded the case to the Sales Tax Off .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n view of the aforesaid provisions, the Sales Tax Officer alone would have jurisdiction to assess the assessee. No provision was brought to our notice which conferred on the Assistant Sales Tax Officer powers of the Sales Tax Officer under rule 5 of the Rules. In our opinion, therefore, the Tribunal was right in holding that under rule 5 of the Rules, only the Sales Tax Officer was competent to as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X