1981 (1) TMI 243

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed 14th May, 1980, suo motu revising the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner dated 19th May, 1979. In the appeal before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, one of the items of turnover disputed was in relation to a sum of Rs. 33,287. It was argued before him that the assessing officer had not given sufficient opportunity to produce the remaining C or D form and the appellants herein pr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... l in respect of the turnover of Rs. 33,287 setting aside the assessment on this turnover." The Board came to the conclusion that the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was not justified in saying that sufficient opportunity was not given to the assessees by the assessing officer and therefore set aside the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and restored the order of the assessing officer .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of the Board as one born out of misunderstanding of the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The point now to be examined is whether the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was justified in remanding the matter back to the assessing officer. The pre-assessment notice in the present case was dated 27th October, 1978, and the matter was adjourned from time to time and ultimately on 18th Janu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X