Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1990 (11) TMI 388

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... itioners would be entitled to the exemption under entry No. 31B of the Fifth Schedule to the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957. Accordingly, assessments were passed on 27th July, 1978, granting the benefit of exemption for the assessment year commencing 1st July, 1976 and ending by 30th of June, 1977. However, on 4th August, 1982, finding that it was no longer entitled to exemption, the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (1st respondent) issued show cause notice proposing to review the order of the assessing authority on the ground that entry 31B under the Fifth Schedule, cannot be applied to the sale of sugar syrup, and therefore he proposed to tax at 4 per cent multi-point under section 5(1) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957. 3.. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and C.S.T.R.C. No. 03360029-6) it was found that the orders passed by the Commercial Tax Officer, XII Circle, Bangalore, under section 12(2) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 read with rule 18(2) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Rules, 1957 (hereinafter called 'the Act and the Rules') on July 27, 1978 is irregular, erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue for the following reasons: The assessing authority, i.e., the Commercial Tax Officer, XII Circle, Bangalore, in his order dated 27th July, 1978, passed for the assessment period from 1st July, 1976 to 30th June, 1977 has exempted the sales turnover from payment of tax in respect of 'sugar syrup' to the tune of Rs. 7,41,485 on the ground that the 'sugar syrup' falls under entry .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... se bearing, S.T.R.P. Nos. 46 and 47 of 1978 which is pending before the honourable High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore, and for which he has requested for postponement of this case till the decision of the honourable High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore. Further endorsements dated 10th December, 1982 and 22nd February, 1983 for which the same reasons were assigned by him on 28th July, 1983 and 16th August, 1983, respectively. Again, further endorsements dated 1st September, 1983 and 5th October, 1983 were also served on the assessee-firm for which Sri R. Nagaraj, Advocate and counsel for the assessee-firm has approached and heard. 4.. The learned counsel for the assessee-firm has relied on the judgment in the case of Krishna Products in S.T. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Tax Officer, XII Circle, Bangalore, for the period from 1st July, 1976 to 30th June, 1977 under section 12(2) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, is modified to the extent of levying sales tax on 'sugar syrup' to the tune of Rs. 7,41,485 at 4 per cent and additional tax at 7 per cent under section 6B of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, as indicated below: (b) The revised computation of total and taxable turnovers is as under: Amount of turnover: Rs. 9,39,207.82 Less: Deductions and exemptions: 1. Tax collected Rs. 9,355.31 2. Sale of sugar-candy Rs. 26,625.20 Rs. 35,980.51 --------------------------- Taxable turnover Rs. 9,03,227.31 --------------- Classification: 1. Sale of 'sugar syrup taxable under section 5(1) of t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tate of Karnataka) where this point was squarely dealt with and it was held thereunder, that sugar syrup will not fall under entry 31B of the Fifth Schedule to the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957. Therefore, the matter is no longer res integra. 6.. We find that [1989] 74 STC 51 (Kar) (Bagi v. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes) has no application to the facts of this case. Only when the transactions are of the character of inter-State sales, the question of applying section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act, in relation to the declared goods would arise. Though ruling in [1989] 74 STC 51 (Kar) (Bagi v. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes) is of that type, from the narration of the facts, it will be clear that all the transactio .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates