TMI Blog2004 (9) TMI 522X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... itioner. Ms. Dharmishta Raval, Advocate and Shri Jitendra Malkan, Standing Counsel, for the Respondent. [Order per : B.J. Shethna, J. (Oral)]. - Heard learned counsel Mr. Dave for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel, Mr. Malkan for the respondents. 2. The petitioners have challenged in this petition the impugned order dated 22-12-2003 (Annexure-F) passed by the revisional author ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ugned order, which is challenged in this petition by the petitioner, it is clear that goods were cleared for home consumption by the petitioner on 31-12-1997 on payment of Central Excise duty of Rs. 1,30,000/- and the same were brought back for reconditioning under Rule 173H on 5-1-1998 and again the said goods were cleared to exhibition held at Mumbai on 19-11-1998 and again brought back on 16-12 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|