2011 (5) TMI 2

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Adv., Mr. Abhijit Sengupta, Adv, Ms. Anima Kujur, Adv., Mr. Yogesh K. Jagia, Adv., Mr. Darpan K. M., Adv., Ms. Hetu Arora, Adv.   O R D E R   Since the issues raised in the present appeals are similar, we propose to dispose of all these appeals by this common judgment and order.   These appeals are directed against the judgment and order passed by CEGAT, Kolk .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 9022.12 is set aside;   (iii) The charge of mis-declaration as regards the number of machines imported by M/s. Tanya Diagnostic Centre is upheld. The matter is remanded to the original adjudicating authority for quantification of payment of duty on the said machines after deciding the classification;   (iv) The issue of deciding the quantum of personal penalty liable to be imposed upo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... oner has been upheld. We are also informed that redemption fine has since been paid. So far the issue with regard to the classification is concerned, the matter has been remitted back and is to be considered by the Tribunal afresh in accordance with law and in terms of the directions issued by the Tribunal.   So far the charge of mis-declaration as regards the number of machines is concerned .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X