2010 (11) TMI 139

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... AT - CESTAT granted waiver of pre-deposit subject to one of the appellants, depositing a sum of Rs. 15 crores - order of CESTAT clearly shows that there was no direction to the appellants to make any pre-deposit of penalty imposed – matter restored back to file Tribunal to decide stay application
J.P. Devadhar and R.M. Savant, JJ. REPRESENTED BY : S/Shri Madhur R. Baya with Sushant Murthy, for .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on order-in-original dated 21st January, 2008, penalties were imposed on the appellants as well as several other parties. Against the levy of penalty, the appellants as well as other parties filed separate appeals along with stay applications before the CESTAT. By a common order dated 14th November 2008 [2008 (232) E.L.T. 210 (Tri.-Mumbai)], the CESTAT disposed off the stay applications filed by t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hrishti Impex Private Limited had failed to make pre-deposit. 4. In these circumstances, the order of the CESTAT dated 8th March, 2010 [2010 (250) E.L.T. 577 (Tribunal)] is quashed and set aside and the matter is restored back to the file of the CESTAT to decide the stay applications filed by the appellants afresh and in accordance with law. 5. The appeals are disposed off accordingly.
.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X