TMI Blog2011 (5) TMI 93X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... concluded that the appellants had no intention to evade payment of duty - Hence, the impugned order is upheld and the department s appeal is dismissed. - ST/78/2011 - - - Dated:- 2-5-2011 - Dr. CHITTARANJAN SATAPATHY, J. Shri C. Rangaraju, SDR, for the appellants Heard both sides. 2. The respondents are not present despite notice. There is no adjournment request. Heard the Ld. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|