9911796707
TMI Blog2011 (8) TMI 261X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur against the Order-in-Appeal dated 30/12/2003. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondents were engaged in the manufacture of furniture and parts thereof falling under Chapter 84, 94, 76 and 70 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The respondents were paying excise duty at the time of clearance of the goods. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Asstt.Commissioner for Rs. 91,437 and Rs.3,34,482/-. Similarly, two show-cause notices were issued for the period Sept.1998 to January, 1999 and February, 1999 to April, 1999. These show-cause notices were adjudicated by the Asstt. Commissioner confirming the demand of Rs. 5,77,019/- and Rs.1,54,667/-. Aggrieved by these aforesaid adjudication orders of the Asstt.Commissioner, the respondents fil ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he aforesaid Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Nagpur does not attain its finality and further if the Department succeeds in review petition with the Hon ble Supreme Court, the appellate remedy is available. 4. The ld. representative appearing for the respondent stated that their case is squarely covered by the Supreme Court s decision in the case of V ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
