9911796707
TMI Blog2011 (1) TMI 750X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... at Raichandani, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri S.M. Vaidya, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Ashok Jindal, Member (J)]. - Heard both sides. 2. In the earlier round of litigation, this Tribunal passed the following order. "We are of the considered view that the jurisdictional Commissioner of Central Excise should re-adjudicate on merits the disputes involved in these cases af ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... xerox copy of the same with a request "for the rest of the documents/records my inspection is over and further inspection of these records may not required". Thereafter, xerox copy was taken by the appellants and made a further request to inspect the records further on 18-2-2002 on the ground that their Consultant Shri. B.N. Rangwani has died on 27-6-2001 and some of the records pertaining to the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... esent during the course of inspection. During the course of inspection, it was found that out of 219 files (relied upon documents), 123 files were not available for inspection. To that effect the appellant further wrote to the Superintendent (Prev.) vide their letter dated 3-7-2002 with a request for further inspection of the remaining 123 files. The inspection of these 123 files were not given to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for inspection. 7. The decision of the Apex Court in the case of Kanwar Natwar Singh is for the documents, which are not relied upon documents in the adjudication proceedings. So the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court was in respect of the documents, which are not relied upon documents and the same is not applicable in this case as in this case in the earlier round of litigation, th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
