2011 (4) TMI 1187

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... o pay tax prior to 18.04.06 - Another submission of the appellant was that what is being transferred was the goods and IPR and the IPR to be taxable are those which are prescribed by law and their case does not fall under this - Held that:- Considering the nature of services transacted, held that there is considerable force in the argument of the appellant - Decided in favour of assessee. - ST/3 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... st this order. It was contended by the appellant that they were only receiver of services from abroad and were not liable to pay tax prior to 18.04.06. Another submission of the appellant was that what is being transferred was the goods and IPR and the IPR to be taxable are those which are prescribed by law and their case does not fall under this. It was pointed out that since they will be eligibl .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X