TMI Blog2011 (4) TMI 1191X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... issed as infructuous. - E/Stay/3804/10 and E/3945/10 - - - Dated:- 25-4-2011 - Mr. M. Veeraiyan, J. Present for the Appellant: Shri Anil Khanna, SDR Present for the Respondent: Shru A.Kr.Shukla, Advocate PER: M.VEERAIYAN Heard both sides. 2. The original authority vide order dated 28.3.2006 confirmed the demand and imposed penalty on the respondents M/s.Kundan Castings Pvt.Ltd. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... uthority, the Commissioner (Appeals), Lucknow vide the impugned Order-in-Appeal No.260-CE/LKO/2010 dt.15.09.2010 has rightly set aside Order-in-Original dated 28.3.2006 again. However, further directions to the adjudicating authority to adjudicate the case de novo after taking into account relevant judicial pronouncements in the case is not correct. 4. It is not disputed that the order of the o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|