2011 (6) TMI 443

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t - Held that:- Since appellants has already deposited sum of Rs.5,41,032/- Considering the same, the appeal is allowed, order set aside and the matter remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals). - E/484 of 2006 - - - Dated:- 6-6-2011 - Shri Justice R.M.S. Khandeparkar, Shri Rakesh Kumar, JJ. Appearance: Rep. by Sh. Sumit Kumar, Advocate for the appellants. Rep. by Sh. R.K. Verma , DR .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 6.2004. The Commissioner (Appeals) had directed the appellants to deposit sum of Rs. 1,50,000/- within fifteen days. The appellants had failed to deposit the same amount within the prescribed period and consequently by order dated 27.12.2004 the appeal was dismissed on that count. When the stay application filed in the appeal before the Tribunal came up for hearing, the same was disposed of alongw .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X