9911796707
TMI Blog2011 (8) TMI 605X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ioner and finally a revision application before government of India - petitioner submitted that he had not appointed J.K. Srivastava, no order of confiscation and revision received - Held That:- A legal professional would not act, file and prosecute an appeal or revision without instructions in a matter which entails expenditure, time and effort. We do not find any merit in the said contentions. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Customs, for release of gold for re-export and demanded monetary value of electronic goods. He also asked for interest. 3. By letter dated 15th November, 2010, the Additional Commissioner of Customs, IGI, Airport, informed the petitioner that the ACMM, had acquitted him on technical grounds and an appeal has been filed against the said acquittal. On the question of return of gold, monetary val ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s were also ordered to be confiscated with an option for redeeming the same on payment of Rs.2,56,000/- and a redemption fine of Rs.50,000/- under Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962. Personal penalty of Rs.1 lakh was imposed under Section 112(a) and (b) of the Customs Act, 1962. 4. Against this order, it is stated that the petitioner had filed an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er wrote two letters dated 23rd December, 2010 and 20th March, 2011, but the respondent vide their letters dated 16th January, 2011 and 21st April, 2011, repudiated the stand and stance of the petitioner. 7. The petitioner has submitted that he had not appointed J.K. Srivastava, Advocate to appear in the matter. He has submitted that no Show Cause Notice was issued and there was no order of co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
