2012 (2) TMI 144

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ved by the order passed by Commissioner(Appeals) in favour of respondents, Revenue filed the present appeal. We have heard Shri N.Pathak, DR appearing for Revenue and Shri Rajesh Jain, ld. Advocate appearing for the respondents.   2. On going through the appeal folder, we find that the issue involved in the present appeal is as to whether the use of brand name of a person, who is director of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ot correct and they have challenged the same before the higher appellate forum. However, we find that the appeal filed by the department before the Hon ble Supreme Court stands rejected vide order dtd. 01.04.10. As such we note that the earlier order of the Tribunal stands confirmed by the Hon ble Supreme Court and has attained finality. As such we find no merits in the Revenue s appeal, the same .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X