2012 (4) TMI 231

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pellant seems to have accepted the liability. Once the liability is admitted, the appellant should have paid the tax for the period from July to Sept 2004 also - Decided against the assessee - ST/476 of 2011 - S/123/WZB/AHD/2012 - Dated:- 3-1-2012 - B S V Murthy, J. For Appellant: Shri Rahul Gajera, Adv. For Respondent: Shri Rajendra Nagar, AR Per: B S V Murthy: The appellant is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh decision and therefore, this is parallel proceedings. 3. I have considered the submissions. I find that appellant paid service tax for the period from Oct 2004 onwards in Mar 2005 itself. Further, while making the payment, for the reasons best known to the appellant, the appellant did not pay service tax for the period July to Sept 2004. Learned couns .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X