2012 (5) TMI 351

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s decision reported in (2011 (5) TMI 779 (HC)) , the same stand rejected. - Earlier order of dismissal recalled - Credit allowed.
Ms. Archana Wadhwa, Mr. Mathew John, JJ. Shri Bipin Garg, Advocate for the Appellants Shri K.K. Jaiswal, DR for the Respondent Per Archana Wadhwa (for the Bench): The application is for restoration of appeal dismissed vide final Order No. ST/91/10 dated 23.9.1 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... se of Nahar Industrial Enterprises reported as 2007-TIOL-555-CESTAT. The said order of the original adjudicating authority was reviewed by Commissioner, who vide his impugned order set aside the same and upheld the demand along with imposition of penalty on the ground that Tribunal s decision in Nahar Industrial Enterprises has not attained finality and appeal filed against the same before the Hon .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X