2012 (8) TMI 246

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ndent submitted that there was no mistake on the part of the Respondent for the said error – Held that:- Cess is required to be re-considered and re-computed. Therefore, the case is remanded to the ld.Commissioner (Appeals) for the limited purposes for computation of quantum of Cess.
SHRI S. K. GAULE, DR. D. M. MISRA, JJ. Shri D. K. Nath, Asst. Commr. (A.R.) for the Department Shri K. K. Ach .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r adjudicating authority s order to the extent short payment of Rs.5558/- only and not as confirmed by the lower adjudicating authority. However, he has dropped the penalty imposed under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. 3. The contention of the Revenue is that the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) has erred in computation of quantum of Cenvat involved in this case. Therefore, the same is requi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X