2012 (9) TMI 810

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... adesh at Hyderabad in Civil Revision Petition No.1188 of 2009, dated 26.3.2010. By the impugned order, the High Court has allowed the Revision Petition and has directed the lower Appellate Court to decide the case on merits.   3. We have heard learned counsel for the parties to the lis.   4. Plaintiff's suit was for recovery of a sum of Rs.2,35,100/- with interest thereon. The suit was .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rt had directed the Defendant to deposit half of the decretal amount within six weeks' from the date of receipt of the copy of the Court's order. Further, the Court had permitted the Plaintiff to withdraw half of the amount so deposited.   7. Aggrieved by the said order passed by the High Court, the Plaintiff is before us in this appeal.   8. During the pendency of this appeal, we had .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X